lamonster.blogg.se

Creo elements pro 5.0
Creo elements pro 5.0








creo elements pro 5.0

To import assembly constraints, select Import component constraints in the Pro/E & Creo to SOLIDWORKS Converter dialog box. When importing an assembly, you can control how to import individual components. The Pro/E & Creo to SOLIDWORKS Converter supports import of free curves, wireframes, and surface data. If all of the features in the file are not supported, you can choose to import the file as either a solid body or a surface model. The attributes, features, sketches, and dimensions of the Pro/E or Creo part are imported. The Pro/E & Creo to SOLIDWORKS Converter imports Pro/ENGINEER part or Creo Parametric assembly files as SOLIDWORKS part or assembly documents. I have not looked at benchmarks like CPU-Z for this purpose - those are only numbers at paper many times, but I have stopped time needed to complete all 4 tasks.Importing Pro/ENGINEER and Creo Parametric Files into SOLIDWORKS With overclocking from 3.3Ghz to 4.7Ghz (and turning down-clocking off) I got +25% boost on average at all 4 tasks. I have observed, that with Hyperhtreding- OFF alone, I got +5% boost.

creo elements pro 5.0

To be more precise about my observation and results, I have tested C3 M110 very extensively last month with:ġ.) import of 350MB STEP mold with 2000+ parts - Creo uses single coreĢ.) Renaming of one part after import - Creo uses single core (renaming takes up to 3 minutes with 2000+ parts!!!)ģ.) NC path computation when milling - Creo uses single coreĤ.) NC Check with Moduleworks - Creo uses all Cores 3000+parts takes more than hour, sometimes even more than two. You will see very disappointing C3 results with 2000+ parts when importing. To answer you question, we don't use Windchill.ħ2Mb is very small to compare CADs - as you said every SW is a bit different.

creo elements pro 5.0

RAM Drive is not bad thing, but I doubt that it would help in my case, when one CPU-Core runs at 99% when importing STEP files. What matters is the difference when importing, regenerating and milling with creo compared to concurrency.

creo elements pro 5.0

As I said, this is hard to analyze under Win7 and is only my personal opinion. This is big disadvantage to me, when using Creo.Īlso, I have compared the mentioned NX, Catia and Solidworks and they do seem to use more than one core at certain points. To be more clear on my general problem with C3: imagine, that I have to import every day like 3-4 molds with 2000+ parts and I wait several hours compared to me concurrent company that can do this in half of the time. If it was up to me, it would certainly happen long time ago. I don't agree, that it's off topic, because when concurrency (like Siemens, etc) can make the same thing faster and quicker, than I am as current PTC customer very motivated to jump on this train.










Creo elements pro 5.0